The mutual fund industry has gone “woke.” It’s not just the asset managers who screen socially “unacceptable” companies in industries involving, say, guns, fossil fuels, tobacco, or gambling. Those have been around for decades.
No, there’s something else amiss. And if you’re investing your hard-earned money, you might be part of the problem.
You see, when you invest in a mutual fund, you’re placing your money with an investment company that buys the shares of numerous corporations. The investment company is the owner of the corporations — it is the shareholder — and you are not. The investment company votes the corporate proxies. You do not.
You may not know it, but these investment companies are, in many cases, focusing your money on political causes with which you disagree. For instance, if you disagree with any of the three prongs of ESG — environmental, social, or governance — you may be surprised to learn that your mutual fund supports them.
And powerful investment companies are strong-arming corporate boards of directors to embrace ESG.
Through the guise of “stewardship,” these investment companies consider it their fiduciary responsibility to “engage” corporations in “risk management.” Only risk doesn’t mean what it used to. The “risk” is not that your investment is in underperforming funds or yielding poor returns. It’s generic “risk” to society that allegedly harms people like you.
John Galloway, formerly of the Obama administration and head of Stewardship at Vanguard, explains how risk has been redefined on your behalf: “Fundamentally, climate change is a risk to our investors, so we use our investor stewardship program to ‘engage’ with companies … to protect long term shareholder value.”
And that word “engage”? It’s a euphemism that fund companies use to describe their interactions with a company’s board of directors. A better term might be “force” or “coerce.”… Read more
